D versionning

[Wouter Verhelst]

"Chris NS" <ibisbasenji at gmail.com> writes:

> +1 for a "2.breaking.bugfix" scheme.  I've used this scheme on
> anything serious for years, and know many others who have; so it is
> not only popular but also quite tried and proven.  Not for every
> project, of course (although I don't understand why the Linux kernel
> team dropped it with 3.x), but for the majority it seems to work
> wonders.

They haven't, on the contrary.

3.x is a release with new features
3.x.y is a bugfix release.

Before the move to 3.x, this was 2.6.x and 2.6.x.y -- which was
confusing, because many people thought there was going to be a 2.8 at
some point when there wasn't.

-- 
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
the following formula:

pi zz a