D versionning
Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Mon Jul 23 05:12:03 PDT 2012
On 16/07/12 23:33, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> We're talking about doing something similar to having 2.x.y, with the main
> branch incrementing x and the "stable" branch incrementing y. Going to v3
> would mean incrementing the 2. We have _no_ intention of doing that for years
> to come.
Just to note that, in the sense of making major changes to the language design,
you're obviously right -- but I don't see the problem with bumping the major
version number just to indicate that some key milestone has been passed (e.g.
implementing in entirely the features described in TDPL).
That might even be a _good_ way of indicating to the wider development world
that you have a really well-defined stable release.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list