DMD 2.1.0?

[anonymous]

On Monday, 23 July 2012 at 16:30:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Given:
[...]
> - That I think a "languageNumber.majorVersion.revision" 
> numbering scheme is better, more widespread and more useful 
> (where "languageNumber" is 1, 2 and maybe 3, a change in 
> "majorVersion" means something is changed in the language and 
> this calls for changes in user code and this is the point where 
> the stable D releases must include all the patches of the main 
> trunk, and "revision" means just bug fixes and tiny 
> backwards-compatible enhancements that are not necessarily 
> included in the stable D release) (See: 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning ).
>
> Then I suggest to call the next release dmd  2.1.0 :-)
>
[...]

It's not majorVersion that is missing from the current scheme,
it's revision.
There already was a dmd 2.1.0:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html#new2_001