Just where has this language gone wrong?

Era Scarecrow rtcvb32 at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 24 15:48:44 PDT 2012


On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 at 22:38:07 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> documented' because they couldn't understand what > were for.

  Sorry my filter stripped that out. They couldn't understand what 
<< and >> were for.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list