@trusted considered harmful
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.ca
Fri Jul 27 20:28:17 PDT 2012
On 2012-07-28 03:24:58 +0000, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.ca> said:
> On 2012-07-28 00:08:28 +0000, "David Nadlinger" <see at klickverbot.at> said:
>
>> @trusted in its current form needs to go. Its design is badly broken,
>> as it leaks implementation details and encourages writing unsafe code.
>
> @trusted is a dangerous thing. Since the first time I tried to use it,
> I always found it troublesome. I agree it needs to be a scope. And for
> backward compatibility, a @trusted function should be exactly the same
> as a @safe function where the whole body is wrapped in a @trusted scope.
And when I say it "needs to be a scope", what I meat is a block. I
don't think it should be a new scope unless someone finds a good reason
for it (unsafe struct destructors?)
--
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.ca
http://michelf.ca/
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list