Review Queue: Should We Start Reviews Again?

[Adam Wilson]

On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:51:56 -0700, dsimcha <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Apparently nothing's been getting reviewed for inclusion in Phobos  
> lately, and the review queue has once again become fairly long according  
> to the wiki (http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue).  I also  
> noticed that a new XML library is already in the review queue.
>
> Is there some reason why none of this stuff is being reviewed?  If  
> std.xml2 is really ready for review, we should review this ASAP since  
> XML processing is fundamental functionality for a modern standard  
> library in a high-level language.
>
> IIRC the current std.xml's inadequacy was a major complaint that Jacob  
> Carolberg, the author of std.serialize, had.  Perhaps when/if std.xml2  
> is accepted, he should modify std.serialize to use it, and std.serialize  
> should be next in the queue.

Doesn't std.hash need to be reviewed?

-- 
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/