D language and .NET platform

[ProHeckler]

Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 29-07-2012 17:30, EngineerSpock wrote:
>> There is a couple of questions.
>>
>> 1. What about interoperability of D and .NET platform?
>
> You should be able to write C routines in D that .NET's P/Invoke can
> call.
>> 2. What is the difference between pure D and D for .NET?
>
> D for .NET is dead because .NET is too limited to represent the
> language, so describing this isn't really worthwhile. :)

That is "a lie" (save for you may not know). .net is a Microsoft product at 
the API-ish level. It "strikes a cord" with "real" programmers, surely. Alex 
needs to be more careful when he posts.  .net is not dead. Not even NOT 
relevant for D. D is at the language level. (AKA, "the language level"). 
"It", cannot address higher level concerns, for it is not even evolved or 
relevant as a child. "Lord of the Flies" and D, have something in common? 
Learning perhaps? Is D an island of childish thought "promogulated" with the 
zeal of an adolescent "guitar hero", "re"inventing "rock-n-roll" and wanking 
his pecker? The island is overloaded with comers. "freedom reigns", and then 
you grow up. Then what? The drug stops. You realize your enemy is 
formidable. Your scope has been small. But your enemy knew that all along. 
And you might even realize that pissing in the wind and beating it, was your 
same old spiel. The wind is not your enemy. And neither is time. You battle, 
and are too quick to battle, that which you do not know. I assure you that 
all you battle is time. And time is not interested in your childish games. 
You are going to lose. A war that does not exist, save for only your 
"lordness", which begs the question is D a lemon tree worthy of pissing on? 
I think it is dismissabke without conjecture. Exclude the masturbatory 
adolescnet males and you have... tada! What? Nothing? Guitar hero. Lord of 
the flies?

Close this wank room.