One against binary searches
xinok at live.com
Mon Jul 30 16:44:16 PDT 2012
On Monday, 30 July 2012 at 19:52:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>> I also tried a quaternary search, but it was 25-30ms slower
>> than a ternary search, albeit it was a bit faster than a
>> binary search.
> I see. are you willing to add some of those searches here?
I've added it to my todo list. I still haven't taken the time to
familiarize myself with Phobos' conventions, so I don't feel
comfortable contributing anything yet.
More information about the Digitalmars-d