Incomprehensible compiler errors
stugol at gmx.com
Mon Jul 30 17:24:15 PDT 2012
On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 at 00:06:43 UTC, cal wrote:
> On Monday, 30 July 2012 at 23:40:02 UTC, Stuart wrote:
>> I have no problem with DMD. DMD is a perfectly reasonable
>> Windows executable. I am objecting to the frustrating way DFL
>> is compile-it-yourself and doesn't work; and also the
>> frustrating way there isn't a single working IDE or GUI
>> designer for D.
> If you're willing try yet another IDE, I use Code::Blocks on
> both windows and linux, and while the intellisense or whatever
> C::B calls it is usually a waste of time it is at least
> completely stable and integrates OK with ddbg (which itself is
> not perfect, but...). It recognizes D syntax and it doesn't
> take 5 minutes to start-up. People also seem to like Mono-D.
I couldn't get C::B to compile anything - either D or C. Mono-D
didn't work for me either. I guess I'm just cursed.
More information about the Digitalmars-d