Incomprehensible compiler errors

Stuart stugol at
Mon Jul 30 17:24:15 PDT 2012

On Tuesday, 31 July 2012 at 00:06:43 UTC, cal wrote:
> On Monday, 30 July 2012 at 23:40:02 UTC, Stuart wrote:
>> I have no problem with DMD. DMD is a perfectly reasonable 
>> Windows executable. I am objecting to the frustrating way DFL 
>> is compile-it-yourself and doesn't work; and also the 
>> frustrating way there isn't a single working IDE or GUI 
>> designer for D.
> If you're willing try yet another IDE, I use Code::Blocks on 
> both windows and linux, and while the intellisense or whatever 
> C::B calls it is usually a waste of time it is at least 
> completely stable and integrates OK with ddbg (which itself is 
> not perfect, but...). It recognizes D syntax and it doesn't 
> take 5 minutes to start-up. People also seem to like Mono-D.

I couldn't get C::B to compile anything - either D or C. Mono-D 
didn't work for me either. I guess I'm just cursed.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list