should pure functions accept/deal with shared data?
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Thu Jun 7 07:41:01 PDT 2012
On 6/7/12 9:13 AM, Manu wrote:
> On 7 June 2012 04:55, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
> <mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>> wrote:
> We could define shared to refuse compilation on odd machines, and
> THEN provide an atomic template with the expected performance of a lock.
> *sigh* .. my biggest pet peeve with the D community.
> ARM and PPC are not 'odd'
I agree. I didn't mean to qualify ARM/PPC as odd.
More information about the Digitalmars-d