How to break const

[Mehrdad]

On Monday, 18 June 2012 at 15:21:36 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> So (**IMHO**) if that's really the case, we should really 
>> spend some
>> time fixing the /design/ of const before the implementation...
>
> This is mostly about the design of object initialisation.
>
>> good idea or no?
>
> Certainly.


My initial instinct would be to require a "const constructor" in 
order for an object to be const-able, but I'm not sure if that 
would work correctly or not..