GDC review process.

[Alex Rønne Petersen]

On 19-06-2012 21:05, bearophile wrote:
> Iain Buclaw:
>
>> "Does D *really* require a new calling convention?
>> Also does it *really* require naked support?
>
> I guess the answers are yes and yes.
>
>
>> I think naked support is a bad idea
>
> Maybe he/she's wrong, and it's a good idea. Where are the deep
> discussions that justify his/her words?
>
>
>> and people who require naked support should be writing an assembly
>> function wrapper."
>
> Why? And why they have to impose a design on another language they
> haven't designed? They are the oweners of their compilers and D is a
> guest, but imposing too much of your customs on a guest is not polite.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Because the guest wants to rearrange the host's home.

D better have a good reason to do so. So far, I have seen none.

-- 
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex at lycus.org
http://lycus.org