GDC review process.

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Tue Jun 19 12:58:06 PDT 2012


On 6/19/2012 11:19 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> 1) D Inline Asm and naked function support is raising far too many alarm bells.
> So would just be easier to remove it and avoid all the other comments on why we
> need middle-end and backend headers in gdc.

I'm not clear on why the inline assembler is a problem?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list