GDC review process.

Trass3r un at known.com
Tue Jun 19 13:51:44 PDT 2012


> 1) D Inline Asm and naked function support is raising far too many alarm  
> bells. So would just be easier to remove it and avoid all the other  
> comments on why we need middle-end and backend headers in gdc.

And the C++ frontend doesn't need these headers for its inline assembler  
implementation?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list