GDC review process.

[Alex Rønne Petersen]

On 19-06-2012 22:51, Trass3r wrote:
>> 1) D Inline Asm and naked function support is raising far too many
>> alarm bells. So would just be easier to remove it and avoid all the
>> other comments on why we need middle-end and backend headers in gdc.
>
> And the C++ frontend doesn't need these headers for its inline assembler
> implementation?

No, it passes the assembly on to the assembler. Simple as that.

-- 
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex at lycus.org
http://lycus.org