How to break const

[deadalnix]

Le 20/06/2012 11:28, Christophe Travert a écrit :
> deadalnix , dans le message (digitalmars.D:170272), a écrit :
>> Le 20/06/2012 10:18, Christophe Travert a écrit :
>> What is the conclusion here ?
>
> I think it is the same as yours.
>
> My conclusion is that delegate's signature should be the same has
> methods's signature, and have the same meaning. That makes the langage
> consistent, and makes sure not to bring any new hole in the langage.
>
> In detail, they should be able to have a const or immutable attribute
> for their frame pointer, just like methods can be const or immutable
> with regard to the this argument, and a pure attribute that has the same
> meaning as methods pure attribute: no global variable access (and no
> impure function calls), but possibility to access the frame pointer.
>

This is definitively my point too.