On Sunday, 24 June 2012 at 18:10:03 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: > To be frank almost anything could 'nicely fit' into util. > That's why we should avoid this abomination at all costs. I tend to agree. An »util« package might make sense in an application, where it could e.g. hold smaller self-contained helper modules, but not so much in a library. David