Is this statement in http://dlang.org/dmd-windows.html still true?

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-06-26 02:56, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> inside http://dlang.org/dmd-windows.html#environment down in the section
> titled Differences between Windows and Linux versions, the statement is:
>
> "String literals are read-only under Linux. Attempting to write to them
> will cause a segment violation."
>
> This looks like an old and obsolete statement related to early
> implementations. Isn't the compiler preventing writing to write to
> string literals?
>
> Or is this statement there to want you not take the address of a string
> literal and attempt to write it via a pointer?
>
> In both case, I think the statement should be modified (removed or
> clarified). Am I reading this correctly?

This is still true for D1 which doesn't have immutable or const. Where 
this is legal:

char[] str = "asd";
str[0] = 'b'; // ok on windows, segfault on posix

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg