package management

Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com
Wed Jun 27 04:43:25 PDT 2012


On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:

> On 06/27/2012 12:49 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Tobias Pankrath <tobias at pankrath.net
>> <mailto:tobias at pankrath.net>> wrote:
>>
>>    On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 at 10:34:53 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>
>>        I find myself wanting this over and over again. Reading the docs
>> for
>>        Orange made me realize, that I'm not alone.
>>
>>
>>    http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/__**wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/__**DIP16<http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/__wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/__DIP16>
>>
>>    <http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/**wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/**DIP16<http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP16>
>> >
>>
>>
>> Wonderful. Is there a vote for it? And what about the private module idea?
>>
>> --
>> Bye,
>> Gor Gyolchanyan.
>>
>
> private module does not make sense, because private means 'only
> accessible to this module'. What you want is a package module.
>

Yes, I thought of naming it a package module, but it semantically conflicts
with the module, which represents the entire package (as described in the
first issue).

-- 
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120627/3a3e009f/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list