standard ranges
Christophe Travert
travert at phare.normalesup.org
Thu Jun 28 03:26:33 PDT 2012
"David Nadlinger" , dans le message (digitalmars.D:170875), a écrit :
> On Thursday, 28 June 2012 at 09:49:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> char[] is not treated as an array by the library, and is not
>>> treated as a RandomAccessRange. That is a second
>>> inconsistency, and it would be avoided is string were a struct.
>>
>> So, it looked to me like you were saying that making string a
>> struct would
>> make it so that it was a random access range, which would mean
>> implementing
>> length, opSlice, and opIndex.
>
> I think he meant that the problem would be solved because people
> would be less likely to expect it to be a random access range in
> the first place.
Yes.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list