package and virtual
deadalnix
deadalnix at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 02:12:38 PST 2012
Le 01/03/2012 01:53, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
> package functions are currenly non-virtual.
>
> The spec claims that "all non-static non-private non-template member func
> tions are virtual," which would mean that package is supposed to be virtual.
> But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual. So, is
> that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package going to be
> made virtual at some point?
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
I think virtuality and package should have nothing to with one another.
package is supposed ot express visibility, not change behavior.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list