package and virtual
Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzorex at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 08:12:36 PST 2012
On 01-03-2012 11:12, deadalnix wrote:
> Le 01/03/2012 01:53, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
>> package functions are currenly non-virtual.
>>
>> The spec claims that "all non-static non-private non-template
>> member func
>> tions are virtual," which would mean that package is supposed to be
>> virtual.
>> But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual.
>> So, is
>> that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package
>> going to be
>> made virtual at some point?
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> I think virtuality and package should have nothing to with one another.
> package is supposed ot express visibility, not change behavior.
100% agree.
--
- Alex
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list