Is it bad for object.di to depend on core.exception?

Daniel Murphy yebblies at nospamgmail.com
Sat Mar 3 20:24:47 PST 2012


"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote in message 
news:jiuol3$rqb$1 at digitalmars.com...
> On 3/3/12 9:19 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> We're basically stuck with this until someone comes up with a solution 
>> that
>> lets everything work as it should, with AAs completely in the runtime or 
>> the
>> compiler.
>
> I think we must migrate the arrays into the runtime.
>
> Andrei

I know.  It was before my time, but I assume you were the one who pushed for 
this in the first place?

The one advantage I can see to having them in druntime gives is that it 
means they can be fully templated, and therefore do comparisons etc without 
going through typeinfo.  This is it right? 




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list