Creating dynamic arrays of known size
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 9 06:39:16 PST 2012
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:59:34 -0500, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>
wrote:
> On Thursday, March 08, 2012 22:05:57 H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:13:13PM -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> > So, I'm plodding along with my AA implementation that *hopefully* will
>> > eventually reach the point where it's usable enough to be dropped into
>> > druntime. I'm writing .keys and .values right now, and wondering
>> what's
>> > the best way to construct the returned array.
>> >
>> > Obviously, using =~ repeatedly is a bad idea, since we already know
>> > the resulting array size. Would this be the best way to do it?
>> >
>> > Key[] keys;
>> > keys.length = num_keys;
>> > for (size_t i=0; i < num_keys; i++) {
>> >
>> > keys[i] = ...;
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > Looking at aaA.d, I see that _aaKeys calls gc_malloc directly and sets
>> > BlkAttr.NO_SCAN. Should I just copy this code?
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Another problem: if Key is a const/immutable type, then keys[i] is
>> immutable, so the keys can't be copied into the resulting array. I tried
>> inout but it doesn't seem to be good enough, because individual array
>> elements need to be assigned to, which violates const/immutable, even
>> though we're really just copying const/immutable data here.
>
> I see two options. Allocate the entire array, set the length to 0, and
> use
> assumeSafeAppend (or maybe the function that it uses, since
> assumeSafeAppend
> is in _object.d) so that appending doesn't cause reallocations, or
> create the
> array as mutable and then cast it to the appropriate type.
>
> 1.
>
> auto keys = new Key[](num_keys);
> keys.length = 0;
> assumeSafeAppend(keys);
> for(i; 0 .. num_keys)
> keys ~= ...;
>
> 2.
>
> auto keys = new (Unqual!Key)[](num_keys);
> foreach(ref key; keys)
> key = ...;
>
> auto actualKeys = cast(Key[])keys;
Use the second method. This is low-level runtime code, it should be as
fast as possible. Casting is OK as long as it's justified.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list