Annotations or custom attributes

Manu turkeyman at gmail.com
Fri Mar 9 08:04:11 PST 2012


On 9 March 2012 17:20, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote:

> Manu:
>
>
>  Okay, so the consensus is, it doesn't currently exist, but there is no
>> real
>> resistance, and is tentatively planned?
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>
> As far as I know there are no concrete ideas yet for the semantics and
> precise usage of this feature. And I think there are different ideas
> regarding what this feature has to do (example: I think of it as as a
> user-defined extension of the type system. Other people think of this
> feature more like the C#, Scala or Java ones).
>
> So if you want this feature to happen and you have good ideas, then I
> suggest you to write down a little concrete proposal of definition
> syntax/semantics (implementation isn't needed now).
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
>

Okay, well I'll do that at some point, but not now. My other multiple
return values thread is about a thousand times more important to me at this
point, so I'll keep driving that for the time being :P
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120309/ac89ab4e/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list