Breaking backwards compatiblity

Alex Rønne Petersen xtzgzorex at gmail.com
Sat Mar 10 11:48:05 PST 2012


On 10-03-2012 20:23, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Alex Rønne Petersen"<xtzgzorex at gmail.com>  wrote in message
> news:jjg7dq$24q$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> On 10-03-2012 18:58, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>>>
>>> Then you must be running a very different Linux from the one I use. In
>>> my experience, it's Windows that's an order of magnitude less responsive
>>> due to constant HD thrashing (esp. on bootup, and then periodically
>>> thereafter) and too much eye-candy.
>>
>> This. On the other hand, OS X has all the eye candy and is still extremely
>> responsive. ;)
>>
>
> That's because they cram [their] hardware upgrades down your throat every
> couple years.
>
>

No one forces you to upgrade.

-- 
- Alex


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list