Breaking backwards compatiblity

[H. S. Teoh]

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:27:20PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Adam D. Ruppe" <destructionator at gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:tfdzpwcijnavdalmnzit at forum.dlang.org...
> > On Saturday, 10 March 2012 at 18:57:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >> It can hardly be called a success technology-wise.
> >
> > It is significantly ahead of its competition at the time.
> 
> And it was a big advancement over 3.1. Pre-emptive multitasking
> anyone? 
[...]

I thought the Unix world has had that years before Windows. But not in
the consumer PC market, I suppose.

But 3.1 was such a sad mess that just about *anything* would be an
improvement on it.


T

-- 
ASCII stupid question, getty stupid ANSI.