Breaking backwards compatiblity
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sun Mar 11 13:02:50 PDT 2012
On 3/11/2012 8:29 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> Win9x was good back then. Now it is crap.
Sure, but it's only fair to assess it in the context of its times, not current
times.
> When doing something new (like D) you don't only need to provide something as
> good as what existed before. Actually, providing better isn't enough either. You
> need to provide enough to compensate the cost of the change, and additionally
> communication/marketing must convince user to switch.
Yup.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list