toHash => pure, nothrow, const, @safe

Kapps opantm2+spam at gmail.com
Sun Mar 11 17:19:25 PDT 2012


On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 23:55:34 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen 
wrote:
> It may be a hack, but you know, those have special 
> semantics/meanings in the first place, so is it really that 
> bad? Consider also that contract blocks are now implicitly 
> const, etc.

Agreed. Those are already special, so I don't think it hurts to 
make this change. But I may be missing some implications.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list