toHash => pure, nothrow, const, @safe
Kapps
opantm2+spam at gmail.com
Sun Mar 11 17:19:25 PDT 2012
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 23:55:34 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
> It may be a hack, but you know, those have special
> semantics/meanings in the first place, so is it really that
> bad? Consider also that contract blocks are now implicitly
> const, etc.
Agreed. Those are already special, so I don't think it hurts to
make this change. But I may be missing some implications.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list