Ideas for Phobos., u++ STL speed comparison

[Timon Gehr]

  On 03/16/2012 02:39 PM, Jay Norwood wrote:
> On Friday, 16 March 2012 at 13:20:39 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
>
> btw, the u++ page claims in the link below to be faster than D by 70% on
> some operations, which they attribute to their STL rewrite. Maybe
> someone should take a look at what they've done. Or maybe this
> comparison is out of date...
>
> http://www.ultimatepp.org/www$uppweb$vsd$en-us.html
>

"Means C++ is still well ahead of D (by 70%) if not being hold back by 
standard library design and average implementation..."

They explain the former results with differences in implementations and 
their new results with differences in languages, after having optimized 
the implementation in one language but not in the other. x)