automated C++ binding generation.. Booost D, NO , Not us. SIMD is more important.

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-03-17 04:34, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 3/17/12, Brad Anderson<eco at gnuk.net>  wrote:
>> Could the wxc generator be be used as a base for building bindings for
>> other libraries?
>
> I hope it will be. It's kind of crazy that the first thing I'm using
> it on is a huge library like wxD, this will likely be its biggest
> unittest, so to speak. :p
>
> Doxygen can be run on libraries with no documentation (there's a
> switch for that), so it can extract the needed data for the generator.
> Of course it depends how complex the library is, e.g. you can't run
> doxygen directly on wxWidgets include files because they're very
> complicated (it actually crashes doxygen), but this is why the wx devs
> have created a separate set of interface files for doxygen.

This is why a proper compiler is needed, this will not work in the long run.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg