Alternative /hipster/ syntaxes for D
ezdiy
eezdiy at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 03:57:58 PDT 2012
On Thursday, 29 March 2012 at 10:49:45 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> Le 29/03/2012 11:47, ezdiy a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> D syntax being C-ish one is great for oldschool class of
>> programmers
>> coming C/C++/Java/C# backgrounds, and although it's quite
>> conscise one
>> compared to, eg. javas, it's still much on the overly verbose
>> side for
>> some people (ie. at least for me :)
>>
>> The question is, how one would go around to successfully
>> implement an
>> alternative modern syntax to "fix" this. Are there some
>> attempts out there?
>>
>
> This isn't a problem. Compare how successful
> C/C++/Java/C#/PHP/Javascript/Go/Objective-C/ActionScript are
> compared to languages with « quite concise » syntax. This is
> a no match.
>
> This style has proven to be readable, convenient and many
> programmers are used to it. If you want to change that, you
> don't only need to prove that another syntax is better, but
> also that it is THAT MUCH BETTER that changing what everybody
> is used worth it. This sounds difficult to me.
I'm not here to start flame about old vs new, use irc for that :)
Speaking to the point: Delight seems as a nice concept, however
it's awfully implemented (hack of 3years outdated gdc). Such
hacks *must* be implemented as code translators for reasons
you've cited. Ie i can just generate code for people who refuse
to learn something new.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list