DIP16: Transparently substitute module with package
Chris NS
ibisbasenji at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 21:23:32 PDT 2012
I'm pretty impressed with the idea, and look forward to its
implementation, but I do have one question. How does this affect
(if at all) the implicit "friend" relationship of declarations?
Since package "foo.bar" is treated as a single module, do the
classes in "foo/bar/alpha.d" and "foo/bar/beta.d" have access to
each other's private members?
I'm not sure whether I favor them losing or keeping their
"friend" status.
----------
Chris NS
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list