DIP16: Transparently substitute module with package

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Chris NS" <ibisbasenji at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:ugopmohijjcnnrchuwbe at forum.dlang.org...
> I'm pretty impressed with the idea, and look forward to its 
> implementation, but I do have one question.  How does this affect (if at 
> all) the implicit "friend" relationship of declarations?  Since package 
> "foo.bar" is treated as a single module, do the classes in 
> "foo/bar/alpha.d" and "foo/bar/beta.d" have access to each other's private 
> members?
>
> I'm not sure whether I favor them losing or keeping their "friend" status.
>

There's always the "package" access specifier.