DIP16: Transparently substitute module with package

[Martin Nowak]

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:06:36 +0200, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:

> On 03/30/2012 11:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> But personally, I like the idea of making it so that publicly imported  
>> symbols
>> can be accessed as if they were in the module that publicly imported  
>> them
>
> +1. That is even better than treating the package module specially.

That already works, doesn't it?