Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :(

Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com
Sat May 5 11:52:48 PDT 2012


well, there's no solution to it of the alias is in use, no matter what
alternatives are.

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Mehrdad <wfunction at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Er, the point is, there are functions ALREADY using size_t, and I need to
> figure out which parameters those are.
>
>
> On Saturday, 5 May 2012 at 18:42:05 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>
>> The effect is the same. You have a new type with a new init, that
>> behaves the same way.
>>
>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mehrdad <wfunction at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The one with TypeDef?
>>>
>>> That's not how it's defined though.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, 5 May 2012 at 18:31:44 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> See my version.
>
>
>



-- 
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list