Defining a custom *constructor* (not initializer!)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-05-07 09:28, Mehrdad wrote:

> Is this something that actually modifies the 'new' operator, or is it
> just a separate factory function that my code would need to switch to
> using?

This does not modify the new-operator. "_d_newclass" is actually the 
runtime function that is called by the compiler when it sees "new" in 
the code.

It would be a separate factory function. As far as I know it's not 
possible to _not_ call the constructor when using new.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg