CTFE and DI: The Crossroads of D

Adam Wilson flyboynw at gmail.com
Wed May 9 14:21:55 PDT 2012


On Wed, 09 May 2012 14:17:30 -0700, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:

> On 05/09/2012 11:13 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 May 2012 14:10:27 -0700, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/09/2012 11:09 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Essentially re-architect the DRT?
>>>
>>> Slightly re-architect the makefile.
>>
>> Right, but that would pretty significantly change the layout of the DRT
>> at least the import level.
>
> Why? For some modules do
>
> dmd -H ...
>
> for some other modules do
>
> cp module.d some/path/module.di

Or that, I'm not perfect (and I don't always see the easiest way), and I  
like it, it's simple. :-) Although the Phobos imports would have to be  
updated as well, not a big deal I suppose.

>> Although it'd be nice to physically separate
>> the support modules from the core runtime modules.
>>
>
> The directory layout is given by the import names.


-- 
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list