Lack of open source shown as negative part of D on Dr. Dobbs

[deadalnix]

Le 09/05/2012 23:29, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
> On Wed, 09 May 2012 17:09:10 -0400, Mehrdad <wfunction at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 at 21:06:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:59:10 -0400, Mehrdad <wfunction at hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What about SNN.lib, which has no source code (even assembly code)
>>>> available whatsoever?
>>>>
>>>> It's currently impossible to make an executable with DMD that *ONLY*
>>>> contains code you want to put in there. SNN.lib /has/ to be in
>>>> there... and it's certainly not FOSS...
>>>
>>> So... Use GDC instead?
>>>
>>> -Steve
>>
>>
>> See the last paragraph of this response:
>> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/jod1sg$2pma$1@digitalmars.com?page=2#post-mailman.465.1336596027.24740.digitalmars-d:40puremagic.com
>>
>
> I must be missing something, or you referenced the post incorrectly...
>
> -Steve

dmd is the reference implementation. GDC is and will always lack behind. 
By definition.