CTFE and DI: The Crossroads of D

[Adam Wilson]

On Wed, 09 May 2012 15:34:30 -0700, Joseph Rushton Wakeling  
<joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net> wrote:

> On 10/05/12 00:25, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> Which is what fueled the market for hundreds (if not thousands) of JS
>> obfuscators.
>
> Well, that's kind of my point really.  Is it so bad (from a proprietary  
> point of view) to have to distribute .d rather than .di files, if you  
> can obfuscate them?

In a word yes. Obsfucation hides details, but it can't hide algorithms  
very well. It can just make them harder to follow. Hence why most  
companies don't put anything of value into JS.

-- 
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/