Lack of open source shown as negative part of D on Dr. Dobbs

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 10/05/12 00:41, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> I do think, though, that it may be something that starts to bite as the
> community scales up in size.

I'll add one more thing on this: you probably don't know whether or not you're 
missing out, as there's no real way you can measure the number of people who 
would like to engage with D but don't because of the licensing issues.

There _might_ be a surprise waiting the day the announcement is made: "reference 
D compiler now fully open source".