CTFE and DI: The Crossroads of D

[H. S. Teoh]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:18:36PM -0700, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2012 21:12:53 -0700, Nick Sabalausky
> <SeeWebsiteToContactMe at semitwist.com> wrote:
[...]
> >Well, if that works for the PHBs, then it works for me (Hmm...Never
> >thought I'd say something like that ;) )

Beware the dark side! ;-)


> >Thinking about it more, I suppose it's debatable whether a
> >PHB-comlpiant obfuscator or a lib-with-embedded-source would be
> >easier to implement and deal with.
> >
> 
> I'm a fan of embedded source as it's relatively easy to get from the
> compiler when it's time to build the output file. No extra steps
> required. :-)
[...]

Exactly. We can satisfy the PHBs *and* have our fun with loading ASTs
from the compiler too. Sounds like a win-win situation to me.


T

-- 
Some days you win; most days you lose.