Lack of open source shown as negative part of D on Dr. Dobbs
dac at nospam.com
Thu May 10 08:24:53 PDT 2012
On 10/05/12 11:02, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> Assuming that LLVM is not an acceptable backend despite its permissive
> licence, and that the community can't buy out the code, I'd suggest
> again the idea of stabilizing the frontend and then synchronizing DMD,
> GDC and LDC updates, with all 3 endorsed as equally valid
> implementations of the reference standard.
Yes. This is what we need to work towards.
More information about the Digitalmars-d