CTFE and DI: The Crossroads of D

[Timon Gehr]

On 05/10/2012 08:15 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:10:15 -0700, David Gileadi
> <gileadis at nspmgmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/10/12 11:01 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
>>> It does require some semantic information. And the solution I've seen
>>> seen most talked about here is some kind of attribute similar to @pure
>>> that tells the compiler to include the implementation in the DI file.
>>
>> I may be off-base here, but this strikes me as a good case for a
>> pragma. No?
>
> Well, it's needs to be at a function level to be useful.
>

pragmas can apply to declarations.

The syntax is

pragma(identifier,...) Declaration

(Where Declaration can be the empty declaration, ';')

pragma(keepImplementation) void foo(){ ... }