Property assignment problem

[kenji hara]

Just before the release of 2.059, I implemented the behavior to avoid
breaking of existing codes for only struct literals. I didn't support
other rvalues with it, like such ternary expression. It was minimum
hack.

I think it is a special behavior of 2.059, and I've been highly
skeptical to leave it up to the future, even if changing it breaks
existing codes.

I also think that a need of 'auto ref stroage class for non-template
function parameter' is increasing.

Kenji Hara

2012/5/11 Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com>:
> On 2012-05-11 09:18, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>> struct literals work. They at least used to be lvalues for some bizarre
>> reason. I'm not sure if they are now, because it went back and forth prior
>> to
>> the last release. They're either still lvalues or the first part of making
>> rvalues work with ref has been implemented (but only with struct
>> literals).
>> I'm not sure which.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
>
> Why would the ternary operator make any difference?
>
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg