Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :(
Mehrdad
wfunction at hotmail.com
Fri May 11 12:21:48 PDT 2012
On Friday, 11 May 2012 at 19:04:52 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> This is a frequent problem with null. Since null is its own
> type now, it doesn't play nice with custom types, only builtins
> enjoy special treatment for null.
It is????? O_________O
(welcome to Python, lol...)
> probably something like opBool:
>
> struct S
> {
> int x;
> static S opNull() { return S(0);}
> }
>
> S s = null; // equivalent to S(0);
Ohhmmmmmmmmmmmm interesting, lemme look at that... thanks
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list