Why typedef's shouldn't have been removed :(

Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Fri May 11 13:14:18 PDT 2012


On 5/11/12, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Since null is its own type now..

What were the use-cases for making it a type? Seems odd to declare it:
typeof(null) x;

I mean what could you do with such a type?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list