D dropped in favour of C# for PSP emulator
SomeDude
lovelydear at mailmetrash.com
Fri May 11 14:41:56 PDT 2012
On Friday, 11 May 2012 at 20:35:53 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
>> Except that it would break the generally expected algoritmic
>> complexity of in,
>> so it'll never happen ( O(n) for arrays, whereas the worst
>> case that would be
>> acceptable would be O(lg n) - e.g. what a binary tree could
>> achieve).
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> 'in' isn't useful in generic code. How it's defined (return
> type and parameter type) depends entirely on the type being
> operated on (who says it's an AA? Or a map-like type at all?),
> so it cannot be used generically in any sensible way.
>
> As such, maintaining any specific algorithmic complexity for it
> serves no purpose IMHO.
I think this has been discussed several times already, and you
still haven't convinced any of us.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list