Killing equals_t

[Era Scarecrow]

On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 02:35:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> equals_t is not mentioned in TDPL (rather, TDPL specifically 
> lists opEquals as returning bool), and I see _zero_ value in 
> having bool at this point. As I understand it, it was created 
> purely for transitional purposes (since D1 made the mistake of 
> having opEquals return int), and I really don't think that 
> that's necessary or particularly helpful at this point.

  Curious, I don't remember it anywhere at all. Then again I 
didn't do much in D1 either..