Getting the const-correctness of Object sorted once and for all
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Mon May 14 08:19:22 PDT 2012
On Monday, May 14, 2012 15:27:41 John wrote:
> On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 06:04:33 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
> > On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 03:19:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> I suspect that the folks who are looking for absolutely every
> >> CPU cycle and want caching and lazy-loading in their types
> >
> > It's not a CPU cycle issue.
> >
> > Caching/lazy-loading can make the difference between a window
> > that freezes, and a window that doesn't.
>
> You can still do this pretty easily. You just have to cast away
> const.
But that breaks the type system.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4219600/logical-const-in-d
Yes, you _can_ do it, but it's not actually guaranteed to work (casting away
const and mutating a variable is _undefined_), and if you do it with an object
which is actually immutable, then things could go _very_ wrong (e.g.
segfault).
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list